🔗 Share this article

Do your LinkedIn connections recognizing you as a thought leader? Are hordes of respondents applauding your advice on growing your venture? Are headhunters reaching out to discuss collaborations?

If not, the explanation might be your gender.

The Experiment: Modifying Gender Identity for Better Visibility

Dozens of women participated in an organized LinkedIn experiment this week after popular discussions suggested that switching their profile gender to "male" boosted their network presence.

Other testers modified their profiles to incorporate what they called "masculine-oriented" language - adding action-focused business buzzwords like "propel", "revolutionize" and "accelerate". Anecdotally, their exposure also improved.

Algorithmic Bias Questions Brought Up

The improved metrics has caused some to wonder whether a built-in sexism in the platform's system favors male users who use professional networking terminology.

Like many large networking sites, LinkedIn utilizes an algorithm to determine which posts are shown to which members - promoting some while suppressing others.

Company Statement

Through a blog post, LinkedIn acknowledged the trend but claimed it does not consider "personal characteristics" when deciding post visibility. Rather, the company explained that "hundreds of signals" affect how posts are received.

Changing gender on your profile does not influence how your content appears in results or timelines.

Individual Results

A social media consultant, who modified her pronouns to "he/him" and her name to "a masculine version", described remarkable outcomes.

"The statistics I'm seeing indicate a sixteen-fold rise in visitor traffic and a 1,300% increase in content views," she noted.

Megan Cornish, a marketing expert, began experimenting after observing her audience decrease substantially.

The Method

• First, she changed her profile gender to "man"
• Then, she used artificial intelligence to rewrite her profile using "male-coded" wording
• Lastly, she repurposed previous content with comparable "agentic" style

The result was immediate: a 415% increase in reach within seven days.

The Downside

Although the success, Cornish voiced dissatisfaction with the method.

"Previously, my content were softer - concise and insightful, but also friendly and relatable," she stated. "Now, the bro-coded version was assertive and confident - like a Caucasian man being overly confident."

She abandoned the experiment after seven days, stating "Every day I continued, and outcomes improved, I became more frustrated."

Varying Outcomes

Some testers encountered positive outcomes. Cass Cooper who modified both her gender to "male" and her race to "white" described a decrease in reach and engagement.

"We understand there's algorithmic bias, but it's extremely difficult to comprehend how it functions in particular situations or the reasons behind it," she commented.

Wider Consequences

These experiments coincide with continuing discussions about LinkedIn's unique role as both a professional network and community site.

Recent changes in the past few months have reportedly resulted in women professionals experiencing significantly reduced exposure, resulting in informal experiments where the same posts by men and women received vastly different reach.

Technical Explanation

According to LinkedIn, the network uses artificial intelligence to categorize and distribute content based on various elements, including post content and the member's career profile.

The company claims it frequently assesses its systems, including "checks for gender-related disparities."

Company representative suggested that current reductions in some users' reach might originate from higher volume due to more content on the platform.

Changing Landscape

According to a tester noted, "masculine-oriented language" appears to be growing on the network.

"Users typically consider LinkedIn as more professional and polished," she remarked. "That's changing. It's turning into increasingly aggressive and unpredictable."