🔗 Share this article

SCertain matches just don’t sound right. Perhaps it’s almost imaginable that, had things gone slightly otherwise in the 70s, Terry Venables or another manager leading their team beyond the Iron Curtain for a crack at Valeriy Lobanovskyi’s tactical masterminds, but a match between Dynamo Kyiv and Crystal Palace is still a clash that elicits a double-take. It seems like a mismatch: how is it possible that those teams even be in the same competition?

However this is the modern world. The nation is fighting conflict, its teams weakened. The English top flight is extremely rich. And the Eagles are coached by among the rising talents of the European football. They didn’t just play each other on Thursday, but Palace triumphed with a degree of comfort. It was their third consecutive win, their 19th consecutive game without defeat.

Managerial Rumors and Next Steps

And so, because no mid-size club can even just be permitted to enjoy a good run, all the discussion is of where the Austrian manager could go next. His deal ends at the conclusion of the season and he has declined to sign an renewal. He is 51; if he is going to lead a major club with the possibility of an long tenure in command, he doesn’t have a huge amount of opportunity to make a move. Might he then be the answer for the Red Devils? He does, ultimately, play the same 3-4-2-1 as the Sporting coach, just rather more successfully.

Tactical Formation and Historical Background

Which raises the question of why a system that has drawn so much doubt at United works so well at Palace. But it’s never just about the formation, nor is it the case – within reason – that a specific system is intrinsically superior than another. Instead certain tactical shapes, in combination with the manner they are implemented, emphasize certain aspects of play. It is, at the minimum, intriguing that since the manager’s Everton won the championship in the 1962-63 season with a W-M formation, only one side has secured the Premier League using with a back three: the Italian’s Chelsea in 2016-17.

Antonio Conte’s team clinched the championship in 2016-17 with a back three and in practice two No 10s.

That success was a bit of a black swan occurrence. The London club that campaign had no continental commitments, allowing them fresher than their competitors, and they had squad members who fit the system virtually remarkably well.

The French midfielder, with his endurance and reading of the game, is practically a duo in one, and he was operating at the base of midfield alongside the calming influence of Nemanja Matic or Nemanja Matic, one of the most incisive playmakers the Premier League has known. That provided the foundation for the dual playmakers: the Belgian wizard, who revelled in his unrestricted position, and Pedro, a expert of the dart into the box. Each of those players was improved by their partnership with the others.

Cultural Factors and Tactical Challenges

To an extent, the relative absence of success for the three-man defense, at minimum in terms of winning titles, is cultural. Not many teams have secured the title playing a back three because not many sides have adopted a back three. The World Cup win in 1966 cemented in the national mindset the efficacy of zonal marking with a four defenders.

That remained the default, nearly without challenge, for the two decades that ensued. But there may also be more specific strategic explanations. A back three derives its breadth from the wingbacks; it could be that the intense high-energy nature of the British football makes the demand on those players too great to be undertaken consistently.

But the system poses particular challenges. It is stable, providing the trapezoid defensive shape – a trio of central defenders protected by defensive midfielders – that is widely acknowledged as the most efficient way to guard against opposition fast breaks. But that is just a single phase of the match. If they push too far from the protection of the three centre‑backs, considering the common use of formations with a central trio, a pair of midfield players will tend to be outnumbered without backup from other areas – except if one of them has the outstanding abilities of Kanté.

Eddie Nketiah rejoices after netting his side’s second strike versus the Ukrainian side.

Advantages and Limitations of the System

The inherent stability of that compact 3-2 block, meanwhile, although an benefit for a side aiming to absorb pressure, turns into a possible disadvantage for a side that seek to go on the offensive to the rival. Its greatest asset is also its greatest flaw. The rigid nature of the formation, the way the center is divided into holders and creators – all No 6s and No 10s in current terminology, with no box-to-box midfielders – means that without a individual to move across lines there is a risk of being read easily; once more, the Blues had the ideal player to fill that role, the Brazilian defender frequently striding ahead from the defense to act as an extra midfield option.

Contrasting Styles at Palace and Old Trafford

Palace don’t care about that. They have the second-least ball control of any side in the Premier League. It’s not at all their role to have the possession. And that is the primary reason why a straightforward contrast with Manchester United’s difficulties is difficult. The Red Devils, by tradition and by expectation, can not be the side with the second-worst possession in the league.

Even if they opted to play on the break against opposing top sides, most of their games will be against rivals who defend deeply and could be happy enough with a tie. In most games there is an pressure on them to control the play.

Maybe a attacking-minded side could play a three-at-the-back system but it requires extremely specific personnel – as Conte possessed at Stamford Bridge. The Austrian’s success with it has arrived at Lask and Eintracht Frankfurt, where he has been able to have his team sit deep and attack at pace.

They have beaten Aston Villa and Aston Villa, because the majority of sides struggle at the moment, frustrated the Blues, and ripped Liverpool to pieces on the counter. But they’ve additionally drawn at home to Nottingham Forest and Sunderland, and struggled to beat Fredrikstad. Defend deeply against Palace and they struggle for invention.

Adjustment and Prospective Possibilities

Could the manager adjust were he to go